HERACLIS-HDV cohort for the factors of underdiagnosis and prevalence of hepatitis D virus infection in HBsAg-positive patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) underdiagnosis remains common. We assessed the HDV screening and prevalence rates in HBsAg-positive patients seen at tertiary liver centres throughout Greece as well as factors affecting HDV diagnosis. METHODS: All adult HBsAg-positive patients seen within the last 5 years were included. Non-screened patients who visited or could be recalled to the clinics over a 6-month period were prospectively tested for anti-HDV. RESULTS: Of 5079 HBsAg-positive patients, 53% had anti-HDV screening (41% before and 12% after study initiation). Pre-study (8%-88%) and total screening rates (14%-100%) varied widely among centres. Screening rates were associated with older age, known risk group, elevated ALT, centre location and size and period of first visit. Anti-HDV prevalence was 5.8% without significant difference in patients screened before (6.1%) or after study initiation (4.7%, p = 0.240). Anti-HDV positivity was associated with younger age, parenteral drug use, born abroad, advanced liver disease and centre location. Overall, HDV RNA detectability rate was 71.6% being more frequent in anti-HDV-positive patients with elevated ALT, advanced liver disease and hepatitis B therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-HDV screening rates and recall capabilities vary widely among Greek liver clinics being higher in HBsAg-positive patients of known risk group with active/advanced liver disease seen at smaller centres, while non-medical factors are also important. Anti-HDV prevalence varies throughout Greece being higher in patients born abroad with younger age, parenteral drug use and advanced liver disease. Viremia is more frequently but not exclusively detected in anti-HDV-positive patients with elevated ALT and advanced liver disease.

Spleen stiffness can predict liver decompensation and survival in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) has been predicting liver decompensation and survival in cirrhotics. The aim of our study was to investigate if spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) by 2D shear-wave elastography could predict better the probability of decompensation and mortality, compared with LSM and other parameters. METHODS: Consecutive cirrhotic patients were recruited between 1/2017 and 12/2021. LSM and SSM were performed at baseline and epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Clinical events were recorded every 3 months. RESULTS: Totally, 177 patients were followed for a mean period of 31 ± 18 months. In Cox regression analysis, only SSM was independently associated with the probability of decompensation (HR: 1.063, 95% CI: 1.009-1.120; P = 0.021), offering an AUROC of 0.710 (P = 0.003) for predicting 1-year liver decompensation (NPV: 81.1% for the cut-off point of 37 kPa). The occurrence of death/liver transplantation was independently associated only with higher SSM (HR: 1.043; 95% CI:1.003-1.084; P = 0.034). The AUROC of SSM for predicting 1-year death/liver transplantation was 0.72 (P = 0.006) (NPV: 95% for the cut-off of 38.8 kPa). The performance of SSM to predict the 1-year death/liver transplantation increased in high-risk patients (CTP: B/C plus MELD >10 plus LSM > 20 kPa), giving an AUROC of 0.80 (P < 0.001). Only 1/26 high-risk patients with SSM < 38.8 kPa died during the first year of follow-up (NPV: 96.4%). CONCLUSIONS: SSM was the only factor independently associated with the probability of decompensation and occurrence of death, showing better diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of 1-year decompensation or death compared with LSM and MELD score.

Comparing 2D-shear wave to transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of 2D-shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and compare it to transient elastography. METHODS: Over 6 months, 552 patients with NAFLD underwent liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by both 2D-SWE and transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) at the same visit. RESULTS: LSM was not feasible by transient elastography (M/XL probe) in 18 (3.3%) and by 2D-SWE in 26 (4.7%) patients. The median LSM of transient elastography was 5.5 (2.8-75) kPa and of 2D-SWE 6.2 (3.7-46.2) kPa. LSMs by transient elastography and 2D-SWE were correlated regardless of the obesity status (r, 0.774; P < 0.001; r, 0.774; P < 0.001; r, 0.75; P < 0.001 in BMI <25, 25-30 and ≥30 kg/m2 respectively), or the degree of liver steatosis (r = 0.63; P < 0.001 and r = 0.743; P < 0.001 in mild and moderate/severe steatosis, respectively). According to transient elastography, 88 (15.9%) patients were classified with at least severe fibrosis (≥F3) and 55 (10%) with cirrhosis. By using the 2D-SWE, 85 (15.4%) patients had at least severe fibrosis and 52 (9.4%) cirrhosis. The correlation between the two methods was strong in patients with at least severe fibrosis (r, 0.84; P < 0.001) or cirrhosis (r, 0.658; P < 0.001). When transient elastography was used as reference, 2D-SWE showed an excellent accuracy of 98.8 and 99.8% in diagnosing severe fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In NAFLD, 2D-SWE and transient elastography have comparable feasibility and clinical applicability providing LSMs with strong correlation, even in overweight/obese patients, independently of the severity of liver steatosis and fibrosis. Thus, either of the two methods can be effectively used for the assessment of fibrosis in this setting.